GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

GST e-books



Tax Domains Sale

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


1
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
State - Uttar Pradesh ✔

  1,156 Results

ORDER Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sri Rajesh Tiwari, learned A.C.S.C. for the State. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of Demand Order dated 02.12.2023 and Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2023 issued consequent to it by the concerned opposite party under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the notices are time bound. He relies u...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KEI INDUSTRIES LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Feb 4, 2025)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, where the writ petitioner is aggrieved by seizure order No. 775 dated February 13, 2018 where the vehicle and the goods of the petitioner were seized and the subsequent order No. 791 dated February 17, 2018 under Section 129 (3) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. 3. The impugned order of February 17, 2018 based o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the respondents under Section 129(3) of the GST Act imposing a penalty of Rs. 5,40,000/-. 2. Perusal of the record indicates that the petitioner claims that the goods in question, were being moved by the petitioner to its parking yard at Varanasi as the borrower, had failed to make payment in terms of the arbitration award, however, the vehicle carrying the goods and the good...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NABROS PHARMA PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 29, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Aayush Pankaj Tiwari and Sri R. K. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 25.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of GST Act as well as the order dated 10.12.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no opportunity of hearing was granted wh...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

OSR CREATION vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 27, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Shri Parth Goswami, holding brief of Shri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State – respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 22.11.2022 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile Squad 6, Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, respondent no. 3 as well as the order dated 9.8.2023 passed by Additional Commissi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAGWAN DAS AGRAHARI vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 24, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 1.5.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 and the order dated 14.3.2023 passed by respondent no. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a very short controversy is involved in the present petition. He submits that proceedings under Section ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAWARLAL AGARWAL vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 24, 2025)

ORDER 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the order dated 19.12.2024, Annexure-1 to the writ petition, passed under Section 129(3) of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017 ('the Act'). 2. Submission has been made that goods being transported, were detained under the provisions of Section 129 of the Act, the notice dated 5.12.2024 and Form GST MOV-7 was issued in the name of the driver. The petitioner claimed ownership of the goods and made a representation on 11....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 05.11.2024 passed by the respondents under Section 74 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, 'the Act'), raising a demand of Rs. 90,25,540/-. 2. A show cause notice under Section 74 of the Act for financial year 2017-18 was issued to the petitioner in terms of the Special Investigation Branch (SIB) report to show cause inter alia making reference to the various findings arrived at by the SIB and calling upon the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged revisional order passed by the Revisional Authority under Section 108 of U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. The contention of the petitioner's counsel is that the revision of the petitioner has been dismissed firstly on merits and then as not maintainable. The submission is that the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHEMINOVA INDIA LIMITED vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 20, 2025)

ORDER 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the order dated 04.01.2025 passed by Respondent no.3 whereby, order under Section 129(3) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'the Act') has been passed requiring the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 92,28,444/-. 2. Several submissions have been made by counsel for the petitioner seeking to question the validity of the order on merits including the fact that the authority passing the order, i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


17
Feb
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Jan 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Feb

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Jan 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Jan 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).