GST Library

Login | Register

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Classification

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

GST Forms

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST Videos

GST e-books



Tax Domains Sale

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,326 Results

NABROS PHARMA PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 29, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Aayush Pankaj Tiwari and Sri R. K. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 25.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of GST Act as well as the order dated 10.12.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no opportunity of hearing was granted wh...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRIBA NIRMAN COMPANY vs. THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) & OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Jan 29, 2025)

ORDER PER: (HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO) Heard Sri V. Raghu Ram, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Anil Bezawada, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Santi Chandra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax appearing for the 4th respondent. 2. The facts in the present case, as stated by the petitioner, are as follows: a) The petitioner is a partnership firm, established in J...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 23.05.2024 relating to the assessment year 2019-20. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of Groceries, Provisions and General Goods and is registered under Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner had filed its return and paid appropriate taxes. However, during the scrutiny of the petitioner's monthly return, the following defects were noti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) Heard Mr. D.V. Pathy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Sadashiv Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K.N. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel, CGST & CX for the respondents. 2. This writ application has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- i) the order dated 02.01.2024 (as contained in Annexure – P2) pa...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 16.08.2024 on the premise that the petitioner had not submitted its reply when, in fact, the petitioner had submitted its reply on 18.10.2023 in response to the notice in DRC-01 dated 13.07.2023. It was thus submitted that the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind to the material on record. 2. The petitioner is a civil works contractor. The petitioner is registere...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CAV JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO) This intra-court appeal lays a challenge to an order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No. 17853/2021. The writ petition was filed inter alia challenging the investigation carried out under Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘CGST Act’ for short); the validity of the summons to the witness dated 31.07.2021; declaration that the recoveries to the tune of Rs. 2,50,0...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr. A. Kanodia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as also heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the CGST. 2. The petitioner herein has assailed the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the learned Joint Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & CX, Guwahati i.e. the respondent No. 2 as well as the Order-in-Original dated 02.06.2020 passed by to respondent No. 3 and has also assailed the communication dated 06.09.2023...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER This writ petition has been filed challenging the order in original dated 23.02.2022 and order in Appeal dated 29.07.2022 passed by second respondent and confirmed by the first respondent respectively that demanded the petitioner to pay GST liability along with interest and full penalty for GST liability. 2. Heard Mr. Joseph Prabhakar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. R. Gowri Shankar, learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents . 3. Mr. J...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT DR. A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. As both these Writ appeals arise from a common order of the learned Single Judge in WP(C). Nos.7967 of 2024 and 7952 of 2024, they are taken up together for consideration and disposed by this common judgment. 2. In these Writ Appeals the appellants are aggrieved by the seizure of cash from their premises by the officers attached to the GST Department of the State in the course of proceedings initiated under Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Act...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 10.10.2023 relating to the assessment year 2017- 18. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of providing rental services of immovable property and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period of 2017-18, the petitioner filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. However, on scrutiny of the petitioner's return, it was notic...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


17
Feb
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Jan 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Jan 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Feb

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Jan 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Feb

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Jan 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).